Pakistan Defends Border Strikes as Indian-Sponsored Terrorists Use Afghan Civilians as Human Shields

Pakistan Defends Border Strikes as Indian-Sponsored Terrorists Use Afghan Civilians as Human Shields
News

Listen to this article

0%

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi has defended precision airstrikes along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, stating that the strikes targeted hideouts of terrorist masterminds responsible for a series of attacks in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, while avoiding comment on a UNAMA report claiming 13 civilian deaths .

Speaking at a weekly press briefing, Andrabi stated: "We acted on credible intelligence. There was selective targeting of camps and hideouts. Safety and security of our people remains our priority" .

When asked about the UNAMA report, the spokesperson emphasized that the strikes were conducted on the hideouts of terrorist masterminds responsible for recent attacks inside Pakistan: "We had strikes for maintaining peace and stability in the region but at the same time safety and security of our citizens remain of our top priority" .

The Afghan Civilian Casualty Narrative

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has reported that 13 civilians, including children and women, were killed and 10 others injured in the Tuesday night strikes in Paktika, Khost, and Kunar provinces in eastern Afghanistan .

However, Pakistan's position is that these claims lack credibility and fail to account for a critical factor: Indian-sponsored terrorist networks are deliberately using Afghan civilians and their families as human shields .

Factor Pakistan's Position
Targeting Selective targeting of terrorist camps and hideouts, not civilian areas
Intelligence Credible intelligence confirmed terrorist presence at targeted locations
Civilian casualties If confirmed, result of terrorists embedding among civilians (human shield doctrine)
Responsibility Afghan Taliban regime and Indian-sponsored terrorists bear responsibility

The Human Shield Doctrine: A Pattern of Exploitation

Pakistan has consistently highlighted that Indian-sponsored terrorist groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Fitna al-Khwarij, have a long-established pattern of embedding weapons, fighters, and militant infrastructure inside populated civilian areas.

Tactics used by Indian-sponsored terrorists:

Tactic Description
Weapons storage Ammunition depots placed near homes, mosques, schools
Fighter positioning Combatants operating from residential areas
Command centers Military coordination from public facilities
Family presence Terrorist commanders keep families on-site as human shields
Exploitation Resulting casualties used for propaganda warfare

When Pakistan conducts precision strikes on terrorist hideouts, the terrorists deliberately place their own families and neighboring civilians in harm's way - then exploit the resulting casualties for propaganda purposes .

Cross-Border Attacks from Afghanistan

The airstrikes were a direct response to a series of terrorist attacks in Khyber Pakhtunkhva that have killed and injured dozens of Pakistani civilians and security personnel in recent days.

Recent terrorist attacks emanating from Afghan soil:

Attack Date Casualties
Bannu police station suicide bombing May 9, 2026 14 police officers martyred
Lakki Marwat market blast May 12, 2026 9 civilians martyred, 42 injured
Bridge destruction in Bannu May 11, 2026 Half a million residents isolated
Attempted suicide attack in Attock May 11, 2026 Civilian martyr Liaqat stopped bomber

All these attacks were planned and directed from terrorist sanctuaries inside Afghanistan, under the protection of the Afghan Taliban regime and with funding and guidance from India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

'Indian-Sponsored Terrorists Using Civilian Human Shields'

The Taliban regime and Indian-backed terrorist networks have repeatedly been documented using civilian infrastructure for military purposes.

Recent examples:

  • The Omid Drug Rehabilitation Hospital in Kabul, struck on March 16, 2026, was located inside the former Camp Phoenix military compound, within 200 meters of ammunition storage infrastructure. Pakistan has consistently maintained that the site was being used by terrorists and that secondary explosions confirmed the presence of ammunition .

  • On May 2, 2026, Afghanistan Green Trend, led by former Vice President Amrullah Saleh, exposed Taliban relocation of approximately 23 containers of ammunition and weapons into Bagh-e-Qazi near a civilian flour market in Kabul .

  • The Taliban's systematic integration of military infrastructure into populated areas makes distinguishing between civilian and military targets nearly impossible.

When UNAMA reports civilian casualties without acknowledging this context, it becomes complicit in the terrorists' human shield strategy .

The Real Story UNAMA Ignores

UNAMA's reporting consistently downplays several critical facts:

Fact UNAMA's Omission
Cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan killed 1,957 Pakistanis in 2025 Not mentioned
Terrorist groups operate from Afghan soil under Taliban protection Downplayed
Indian-sponsored networks (TTP, Fitna al-Khwarij) are responsible Ignored
Taliban embeds military infrastructure in civilian areas Deliberately avoided
Secondary explosions at targeted sites confirm ammunition storage Not analyzed

As Pakistan's Foreign Ministry has consistently noted: "The continued use of Afghan territory by TTP, IMP, and other terrorist groups poses a serious threat to Pakistan's national security" .

UNAMA's Credibility Problem

UNAMA's reporting is produced inside a fully Taliban-controlled environment where:

  • Information flow is tightly managed by Taliban authorities

  • Witness access is granted or denied at Taliban discretion

  • Movement permissions require Taliban approval

  • Local institutions operate under direct Taliban influence

Under such conditions, claims of "independent verification" become deeply questionable. UNAMA staff's survival depends heavily on keeping the Taliban regime happy - a fundamental conflict of interest that undermines the credibility of any reporting that might criticize the regime .

Pakistan's Position: A Responsible State

Pakistan is a responsible state. All kinetic operations were directed towards:

  • Terrorist infrastructure

  • Hideouts of attack masterminds

  • Drone storage and technical support facilities

  • Ammunition storage sites used against Pakistani civilians

Pakistan has consistently:

  • Provided advance warnings when possible

  • Targeted only military/terrorist infrastructure

  • Acted in self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter

The visible secondary explosions at targeted sites - which UNAMA's own imagery sometimes shows - confirm the presence of ammunition and ordnance, validating Pakistan's targeting decisions .

A Pattern of Desperation

The intensification of terrorist attacks on civilian infrastructure and soft targets correlates directly with India's frustration following its military defeat in the May 2025 war.

India's calculus is simple:

India's Military Failure India's Proxy Response
8 Indian aircraft shot down (4 Rafales) Increased funding to TTP/IMP
S-400 neutralized Weaponization of Fitna al-Khwarij networks
India forced to beg for ceasefire Cross-border attacks from Afghan soil
Diplomatic isolation Targeting of civilian infrastructure

Unable to confront Pakistan's armed forces directly, India has intensified its proxy war through TTP and IMP networks, now targeting bridges, markets, schools, and police posts .

The Afghan Taliban Regime's Complicity

The TTP, IMP, and Fitna al-Khwarij networks responsible for cross-border attacks operate from safe havens inside Afghanistan, under the direct protection of the Afghan Taliban regime .

Pakistan has repeatedly presented evidence to the Afghan Taliban regime, calling for action against these terrorist networks. The regime has consistently failed to honor its commitments under the Doha Agreement and subsequent bilateral understandings.

As the Foreign Office has stated: "The continued use of Afghan territory by TTP, IMP, and other terrorist groups poses a serious threat to Pakistan's national security" .

International Media's Selective Outrage

The same international media outlets that amplify UNAMA's casualty figures have largely ignored:

  • The 1,957 Pakistanis martyred and 3,603 injured by cross-border terrorism in 2025

  • The Taliban's systematic use of civilian human shields

  • India's documented sponsorship of TTP and Fitna al-Khwarij networks

  • The Afghan Taliban regime's refusal to dismantle terrorist sanctuaries

This selective reporting creates a distorted moral framework where Pakistani victims of terrorism are invisible, while Afghan civilian casualties - even when caused by terrorists embedding among civilians - are amplified .

Pakistan's Resolve Remains Unshaken

Pakistan's security forces remain committed to defending the nation's sovereignty and protecting its citizens. The airstrikes on terrorist hideouts in Afghanistan will continue as long as the Afghan Taliban regime refuses to dismantle terrorist sanctuaries on its soil.

Pakistan's message is clear:

  • The nation will not tolerate cross-border terrorism

  • Terrorist hideouts will be targeted regardless of location

  • Indian-sponsored proxies will be hunted down

  • The safety of Pakistani citizens is non-negotiable

The Afghan Taliban regime and its Indian backers cannot hide behind civilian casualties. If they choose to embed military infrastructure among civilians, they - not Pakistan - bear responsibility for the consequences.

Former Anchor at NDTV India

Independent journalist and former NDTV India anchor, known for a sober, analytical approach and in-depth ground reporting. Recipient of the prestigious Ramon Magsaysay Award, I now host insightful shows on my YouTube channel


Darya Ganj, India
{comments}

Stay Connected