Pakistan Rejects UK's One-Sided Critique of Afghan Border Strikes, Highlights 52 Civilian Martyrs

Pakistan Rejects UK's One-Sided Critique of Afghan Border Strikes, Highlights 52 Civilian Martyrs
News

Listen to this article

0%

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan's Foreign Office has forcefully rejected a one-sided critique by British Richard Lindsay regarding Pakistan's counterterrorism operations along the Afghanistan border, labeling his comments as disconnected from ground realities and ignoring the systematic targeting of Pakistani civilians by the Afghan Taliban regime.

The exchange marks the latest diplomatic friction as Pakistan continues its campaign against terrorist sanctuaries on Afghan soil, with Islamabad urging the international community to recognize the unprecedented sacrifices Pakistan has made in the fight against terrorism rather than lecturing it on selective narratives.

UK Concerns Rejected as Disconnected

Lindsay had expressed concerns over violence in Afghanistan's Kunar province, where the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) reported that dozens of civilians were killed or injured on April 27 following Pakistani strikes targeting terrorist hideouts.

Pakistan's Foreign Office Spokesperson Tahir Andrabi responded by noting that Lindsay's comments were disconnected from the realities of the border region and failed to acknowledge the continuous cross-border attacks being launched from Afghan soil against Pakistani civilians.

The Foreign Office reiterated that Pakistan's counterterrorism operations are directed exclusively at terrorist infrastructure and hideouts - not at civilians - and that the Afghan Taliban regime bears responsibility for allowing its territory to be used as a launchpad for attacks against Pakistan.

52 Pakistani Civilians Martyred, 84 Injured Since March 26

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) released damning figures that expose the true nature of cross-border terrorism emanating from Afghanistan:

Period Civilians Martyred Civilians Injured
Since Eid ul Fitr (March 26, 2026) 52 84

According to MOFA, these casualties are the direct result of:

  • Cross-border shelling by Afghan Taliban forces

  • Indiscriminate targeting of civilian populations in Pakistani border districts

  • Mortar and artillery strikes on residential areas

  • Drone attacks on civilians, including children playing cricket

  • Facilitation of Khariji terrorist attacks from sanctuaries inside Afghanistan

The Foreign Office noted that the majority of these casualties occurred after Pakistan's brief pause in operations following Eid ul Fitr - a pause extended in good faith. Rather than reciprocating, the Afghan Taliban regime intensified its attacks on Pakistani civilians, demonstrating that it is not a partner in peace but a participant in terror.

Afghan Civilian Casualty Claims Lack Credibility

Regarding UNAMA's report of civilian casualties on the Afghan side, Pakistan's Foreign Office dismissed such claims as lacking credibility. The statement noted that:

  • The Afghan Taliban regime has a documented history of fabricating civilian casualty figures for propaganda purposes

  • Pakistan's strikes are precisely targeted at terrorist hideouts and infrastructure, not civilian areas

  • UNAMA's reporting on Afghanistan has repeatedly relied on unverified Taliban-provided figures

  • The same international bodies that express concern over Afghan civilians have remained silent on the 52 Pakistani civilians martyred by Afghan Taliban shelling

The Root Causes: Afghan Taliban Harboring Terrorists

Pakistan's Foreign Office emphasized that one-sided remarks ignoring the root causes of terrorism do not help achieve regional peace or stability.

The root cause is clear: The Afghan Taliban regime continues to harbor terrorist organizations on its soil, including:

  • Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) - Responsible for thousands of terrorist attacks inside Pakistan

  • Fitna al-Khwarij - Indian-sponsored proxy terrorist networks

  • Al-Qaeda - The global terrorist organization responsible for 9/11

  • Other designated terrorist groups that operate with impunity under Taliban protection

Until the Afghan Taliban regime:

  • Stops harboring terrorists

  • Prevents cross-border attacks

  • Takes action against Indian intelligence operatives on its soil

  • Secures its side of the border

... violence will continue. The responsibility for civilian casualties on both sides lies squarely with the regime in Kabul that has chosen to shelter terrorists rather than govern responsibly.

Pakistan's Unparalleled Sacrifices in Counterterrorism

The Foreign Office reminded the United Kingdom and the international community that Pakistan has made sacrifices in the fight against terrorism that few nations can comprehend:

  • Over 80,000 Pakistani civilians and security personnel martyred since 9/11

  • Economic losses exceeding $150 billion

  • Hosting millions of Afghan refugees for decades

  • Conducting multiple counterterrorism operations that dismantled Al-Qaeda and TTP networks

  • Losing over 180 peacekeepers in UN missions worldwide

Despite these sacrifices, Pakistan is often lectured by nations that have contributed little to global counterterrorism while demanding that Pakistan absorb attacks from its borders without response.

The Foreign Office stated plainly: "Pakistan has made unparalleled sacrifices in the fight against terrorism and expects the international community to understand the ground realities, not selective narratives."

Selective International Outrage

The Foreign Office also highlighted the selective nature of international outrage. The same voices that express concern over Afghan civilians:

  • Remain silent when 52 Pakistani civilians are martyred by Afghan Taliban shelling

  • Ignore daily cross-border attacks on Pakistani villages

  • Refuse to condemn the targeting of children playing cricket by Afghan drones

  • Overlook the systematic demolition of mosques and homes by Taliban forces

  • Disregard Indian-sponsored terrorism emanating from Afghan soil

This selective approach has only emboldened the Afghan Taliban regime to continue its aggression while enjoying diplomatic cover from international bodies like UNAMA, which have consistently failed to hold Kabul accountable for cross-border terrorism.

What Pakistan Expects from the International Community

Pakistan's Foreign Office outlined what genuine international partnership should look like:

  1. Acknowledgment of ground realities - The Afghan Taliban regime harbors terrorists, and those terrorists attack Pakistan. This is not opinion. It is fact.

  2. Equal application of international law - Civilian casualties on both sides matter. The 52 Pakistani civilians martyred by Afghan Taliban shelling deserve as much international concern as any reported on the Afghan side.

  3. Pressure on the Afghan Taliban regime - The international community must demand that Kabul take concrete action against terrorist sanctuaries on its soil, not merely make promises it has no intention of keeping.

  4. Recognition of Pakistan's sacrifices - Pakistan has borne the brunt of terrorism for two decades. Lecturing it on civilian casualties while ignoring its own civilian losses is hypocrisy.

  5. Consequences for inaction - If the international community cannot persuade the Afghan Taliban regime to stop harboring terrorists, then it should not criticize Pakistan for defending itself.

The Durand Line: Ongoing Clashes Since February 2026

The current escalation along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border began in late February 2026 when Pakistan launched Operation Ghazab Lil Haq in response to repeated cross-border attacks by Afghan Taliban forces and TTP terrorists operating from Afghan soil.

Key developments since February:

  • Pakistan has captured territory inside Afghanistan, including the Ghudwana enclave (32 square kilometers)

  • Afghan Taliban forces have been decisively defeated in multiple engagements

  • Hundreds of Afghan Taliban fighters have been killed or wounded

  • Pakistan has established new border posts to prevent infiltration

  • Afghan Taliban have resorted to targeting civilians after failing on the battlefield

The Foreign Office reiterated that Pakistan reserves the right to defend its sovereignty and its citizens - and will continue to do so, regardless of international criticism that fails to acknowledge the full picture.

Conclusion: Real Partnership Requires Real Understanding

Pakistan does not seek conflict with Afghanistan. It seeks peace - genuine, lasting peace that requires the Afghan Taliban regime to fulfill its obligations under international law and previous agreements.

But peace cannot be one-sided. Pakistan cannot be expected to absorb cross-border attacks indefinitely while the Taliban regime provides sanctuary to terrorists and international bodies lecture Islamabad about civilian casualties.

As the Foreign Office stated, one-sided remarks that ignore the root causes of terrorism do not help. The international community must choose: either apply pressure on the Afghan Taliban regime to stop harboring terrorists, or stop criticizing Pakistan for defending itself against those same terrorists.

Pakistan has paid too high a price in blood and treasure to now be lectured by those who have not made similar sacrifices. The martyrs of Pakistan - all 80,000 of them - deserve better.

Former Anchor at NDTV India

Independent journalist and former NDTV India anchor, known for a sober, analytical approach and in-depth ground reporting. Recipient of the prestigious Ramon Magsaysay Award, I now host insightful shows on my YouTube channel


Darya Ganj, India
{comments}

Stay Connected